To paraphrase an excellent movie line: "It seems so in this case, now doesn't it?" Just to recap, Fractal (or at least their moderators) ridiculed my story suggesting that the delay may be more than two weeks (and also sent me a threatening email prior - an unnecessary move that isn't exactly sitting well with me). Here we are two weeks and two days later (sure, there may be some wiggle room in what they said about "shipping soon after"), but one has to wonder where the user demos, manuals (or did I miss this posting), teaser videos, etc. etc. are if this thing is going to ship imminently. I'm guessing that we would have heard from folks if they had received their "shipping email" - and so pre-apologize if they are shipping, but people are inexplicably remaining silent about it. This isn't about "trading quality for expediency" - that's not my point (as I've detailed elsewhere, a million other companies execute both on quality and efficiency), it's about delivering on promises, revised promises, and then updated revised promises. I know many folks have held off buying would-be competing products (a product would have to exist in order to have a competitor), and in some cases, sold their existing equipment rigs in reliance of FAS promies, revised promises, and then updated revised promieses. What comes after "updated revised promises"? I guess we'd call it a "hunch". So, FAS, what is your best "hunch" on when this thing will actually ship? I'm going to be sadly amused if this doesn't ship Q1.