Hi,Specifically in the align page, along with negative alignment values for IRs that didn't get auto-trimmed.
This would relieve a bit of tweaking time.
Same for me and I still use it in my DAW with IRs. MPT IRs don't need phase reverse or alignment, but they sound weird if you want to do your own alignment, so I use raw IRs most of the time.+1 on the Phase reverse .... Wouldn't that allow for better IR alignment ? I used to do that when mic'ing a cabinet .... Reverse the phase on one mic and then move it around until I got no sound ( or as little as possible ), then flip the phase back .... That's how I knew my mics were phase aligned as much as possible ....
Yep - and adding any amount of smoothing also applies auto-trim.@ProfEmerald sometimes auto-trim on import doesn't work so an IR may have a long positive offset.
I think it aplies minimum phase, not auto-trim.Yep - and adding any amount of smoothing also applies auto-trim.
Oops, wrong terminology.I think it aplies minimum phase, not auto-trim.
Anyway, +1 to the wish
I think the actual amount of "smoothing" applied by 0.01 would be inaudible from a phasing, or any other, perspective. I could be wrong as I am not in all the technical details, but such would be my experience from tweaking and listening.I wasn't aware of that with smoothing, but then smoothing adds another layer of complexity with phase issues.
I'll try it later with the new beta. Any kind of filter or process, even minimally, will most of the time have some phase byproduct which is a pain to deal with if you don't have a phase invert available.I think the actual amount of "smoothing" applied by 0.01 would be inaudible from a phasing, or any other, perspective. I could be wrong as I am not in all the technical details, but such would be my experience from tweaking and listening.
Glad it worked out. That's how I do it!@ProfEmerald I was able to use smoothing at .0001 to do the autotrim, thanks for that tip!