as you suspect, the Mix knob performs the function you think. as paranoid mentioned, it's sometimes done so there is no Reverb on the Delay trails and other specifics like that. some people also like to arrange it as parallel just because that's how their mind works when thinking about those effects. so even with the same function as Mix set to 50% in series, they use parallel routing instead.I know this is such a newbie question but I'm honestly trying to figure out why you'd use parallel blocks as opposed to a straight line of blocks. Is it for actual parallel processing? Because a lot of these FX have a mix knob.
Yup. Just like in mixing when you have aux tracks, always set the FX to full wet to blend the send. I get that. I just wasn't aware there was a "send fader".as you suspect, the Mix knob performs the function you think. as paranoid mentioned, it's sometimes done so there is no Reverb on the Delay trails and other specifics like that. some people also like to arrange it as parallel just because that's how their mind works when thinking about those effects. so even with the same function as Mix set to 50% in series, they use parallel routing instead.
though everyone can of course arrange it how they want, a common error i see is people doing Parallel routing because "it's better" yet their MIX control is not set to 100%. anything less than 100% for the MIX of a Parallel effect will introduce more Dry signal and increase the levels more than they should be, skewing the reason for Parallel routing. of course there may be exceptions, but for the most part, that Mix should always be 100% for the Parallel effect.
Putting the reverb block in parallel at 100% wet can be useful to avoid the drop in the dry signal level when switching the reverb on and off on the fly. For the delay block though, this is not an issue, as it has a different mix law that keeps the dry signal level constant up to 50% mix.
Likely doesn't make a huge difference in most cases
Thought I had this worked out. I run both delay and reverb in parallel. I set Level to 0db and mix to 100%. Use input gain to set desired amount, and assign it to a pedal on the delay. Footswitch setup for delay on/off. Same setup for the reverb, but just set the input gain to desired amount and leave it. I never used to shut my reverb off, but lately i assigned to a footswitch. 1st time I shut it off notice the increase in volume, thus making me adjust my reverb level to greater than 0db. Checking the wiki, says when running parallel set Level to 0db and use input gain. The Reverb will not allow me to set any Bypass mode. Not a big deal, since I leave the reverb on 99% of time.
hmm i swear it was more popular to Mix to 100% and use LEVEL to adjust the mix. Input Gain is a popular choice when using a Pedal to adjust the amount of reverb real-time.Thought I had this worked out. I run both delay and reverb in parallel. I set Level to 0db and mix to 100%. Use input gain to set desired amount, and assign it to a pedal on the delay. Footswitch setup for delay on/off. Same setup for the reverb, but just set the input gain to desired amount and leave it. I never used to shut my reverb off, but lately i assigned to a footswitch. 1st time I shut it off notice the increase in volume, thus making me adjust my reverb level to greater than 0db. Checking the wiki, says when running parallel set Level to 0db and use input gain. The Reverb will not allow me to set any Bypass mode. Not a big deal, since I leave the reverb on 99% of time.
Stereo vs Mono is a completely separate topic from Parallel routing. one concept of Parallel is making it so your Delay repeats don't have Reverb applied to them. you'd do this with Parallel routing, and you could then go Mono or Stereo regardless.Question: is Parallel at all relevant when not sending your signal in stereo? When I play live, my signal is mono, with one out going to my monitor and the other to FOH.