Have heard the sample late at night on my laptop and seems to me that the second was more compressed, i assume. You assume that you are using the stock IR of the Axe? (because with better IR or in a good cab some differences can be more obvious)FractalAudio said:bmi said:Close but not the same texture. 9.03 more compressed.
HA, gotcha. 9.03 was first, 6.10 second. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
See? The power of suggestion. You assumed 9.03 was second and truly believed you heard a difference.
FractalAudio said:bmi said:Close but not the same texture. 9.03 more compressed.
HA, gotcha. 9.03 was first, 6.10 second. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
See? The power of suggestion. You assumed 9.03 was second and truly believed you heard a difference.
Mr.PC said:FractalAudio said:bmi said:Close but not the same texture. 9.03 more compressed.
HA, gotcha. 9.03 was first, 6.10 second. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
See? The power of suggestion. You assumed 9.03 was second and truly believed you heard a difference.
Did bmi say which one is the axe in your example? :roll:
So what? So then your examples are just made for fooling people? You know the reactions well....a bunch of fanboys posting their funny youtube clips, funny pictures to make fun of other people, or even repeat your posts to get their missing attention back. That makes this board what it is today.....
Neither steff or bmi said anything negative, insulting people or making fun of others. They just share their experience in a very polite way. I'm a bit dissapointed about some "other" guys here......
So I asking you again. What are you using as your reference speaker system when improving the sound-engine (I guess you find a more clever word to describe it) on the Axe-Fx? I'm just curious
I also believe that I'm unable to catch my 7.04 tone with 9.xx ....no problems and no offense so far! It's all good here. I also don't need to post more clips as I did. But I have a theory what might could be the reason of the so called "improved sound" or "improved power amp" or what every you may call it.
It has a lot to do with the late Atomic FR products in my ears. Since they teamed up, the Atomic became the reference for further improvments on the axe-sound-engine in my opinion. Since the Atomic FR couldn't be improved (it's hardware, it has to be "perfect" from day one..... :lol: sorry, little joke here) Please correct me, if I'm saying something wrong here. This are just my thoughts
@ all: Please get back to the topic. No "funny talking", no pictures of facepalms what ever, no stupid jokes or even insulting other members here. Please...... :ugeek:
Matman said:angello120 said:This means more hours spent re-working stuff
Granted people say I am fast with the Axe-Fx, but it takes me just a few minutes to re-work any particular sound for a given new firmware, new listening environment, new amp, etc.
Is there some particular part you feel you're getting stuck on after lowering the new transformer hi resonance parameter in the amp?
FractalAudio said:I'm sorry guys but anyone who thinks there is a significant difference in the tone is talking out their sphincter.
stef herbuel said:i think i'd better continue this kind of debate in a "neutral" forum in the gear page or huge racks forum as i don't want my post to be deleted and as i see moderating is VERY oriented , maybe there scott will be less .."influenced" as i see tonygtr still here ,as he insulted a few of us, in any other forum he would have been banned, not here. who knows ?.
so , see you there or in another place, ,without this really arrogant ambiance. bye.
Cron said:Sorry a bit late on the clip but the 1st half sounded a bit more boxy, the 2nd half had a tad more low end and high end clarity to my ears. Maybe my ears are deceiving me but listening through my studio monitors the 2nd half shifts a bit to the right in the image. Not a huge difference though.
Edit: the louder i listen to the clips the less difference i hear.
The ears are very temperamental things.
Fractal uses purpose specific, high end testing equipment for product development - not Atomic products (as good as they happen to sound ). Furthermore, at this point in time, Atomic Reactor Series products have not even been used as a reference in building factory presets.Mr.PC said:It has a lot to do with the late Atomic FR products in my ears. Since they teamed up, the Atomic became the reference for further improvments on the axe-sound-engine in my opinion. Since the Atomic FR couldn't be improved (it's hardware, it has to be "perfect" from day one..... :lol: sorry, little joke here) Please correct me, if I'm saying something wrong here. This are just my thoughts
Muris_Varajic said:The only thing that bothers me in this thread is the way some people are talking to Cliff.
Ok. they do have certain problems regarding sounds, firmwares etc, no one can deny that.
But really we should have a bit more dignity and respect when talking to a guy
who invented a piece of gear that we ALL enjoy, more or less...
I have used different gear through years but I never actually had a chance to speak
with the man himself who created that gear, talking about Mesa, Peavey, Engl, T.C., Rocktron, Marshall etc.
We should respect that highly, no matter what...
I am not saying that you should stop sharing your experiences with firmwares, no!!
All I'm saying that we should have different approach when talking to Cliff vs. talking to other members, nothing else.
marvinx said:I don't think it makes a difference how you talk to Cliff vs other memebers. He's human like the rest of us period. Actually that mentality really bothers me.
Frankly , no one should blatantly disrespect Cliff OR ANYONE ELSE on the forum.
~mx~
what's about talking to your sphincter?Muris_Varajic said:The only thing that bothers me in this thread is the way some people are talking to Cliff.
Ok. they do have certain problems regarding sounds, firmwares etc, no one can deny that.
But really we should have a bit more dignity and respect when talking to a guy
who invented a piece of gear that we ALL enjoy, more or less...
I have used different gear through years but I never actually had a chance to speak
with the man himself who created that gear, talking about Mesa, Peavey, Engl, T.C., Rocktron, Marshall etc.
We should respect that highly, no matter what...
I am not saying that you should stop sharing your experiences with firmwares, no!!
All I'm saying that we should have different approach when talking to Cliff vs. talking to other members, nothing else.