@ELC sounds throaty and wet. Cool sounds. As an FYI: if you're using the same IR in both slots and not doing anything different to one of the slots, you can just roll with a normal CAB block. No need to use a stereo CAB block setup there.
Yes. The cab has to be in a stereo mode if you want to preserve an incoming stereo signal.This keeps the audio from collapsing to mono... so it is still a viable technique in the cases where collapsing to mono was undesirable?
There's no collapse if everything before the CAB block is mono. In this case, that is true.This keeps the audio from collapsing to mono... so it is still a viable technique in the cases where collapsing to mono was undesirable?
Full disclosure, I only say this because I raised the same point as you on someone else's preset
btw - you don't need to use damping where the pedal is attached to speed, because the rotary has it's own ramp speed controls.
If you're delaying one cab then you're introducing comb filtering and Haas delay effects which would explain why you think that sounds wider in a stereo field.I feel like I get the best modulation sounds with stereo cabs and mostly parallel 100% wet routings.
A single ultra-res cab running into heavy modulation seems to end up flat sometimes.
I usually pan the Cabs hard L-R and maybe add .05ms of delay to one side
There is no interference between stereo and parallel effects. If you have a stereo signal, nixing in a parallel signal son't collapse things to mono.re: Stereo vs mono discussion above...
As I understand it, as long as you don't run a stereo effect into a mono only block, stereo will be represented.
How does this interact with parallel effect??