Jack Napalm
Power User
Thanks for the tip. I can see the multiplexer being useful in a few scenarios.
Yep, to be sure. That's true.As long as you only change the channel on the AMP block that’s not currently active you can fade between 4x4 distinct AMP models on the III.
Thought I would give the original intention of this post a try. Hopefully I captured Yek's idea correctly. In this case, I have Volume, Wah, and Whammy all set to use one external pedal. Then flipping through the channels of the Multiplexer to switch the input. Just some random noodling and rocking the pedal around.
It doesn’t matter what you have further down the line: two amps, a wah, three delays...Great thread resurrected... The video shows how well this can work. However, using this same setup, how would you deal with two amps further down the line? they'd have to be on rows different from the wah etc..? or is this where the multiplexers channels come in?
So if I have 2 amps on rows 2 and 4 that I'm using the multiplexer on and then have yeks stuff on those same rows they will not be affected?It doesn’t matter what you have further down the line: two amps, a wah, three delays...
The Multiplexer only switches between signals connected to its input. Two amps further down the signal chain aren't going to be connected to the Multiplexer's input.So if I have 2 amps on rows 2 and 4 that I'm using the multiplexer on and then have yeks stuff on those same rows they will not be affected?
Show us a screen shot of the layout. I can’t tell what you’re trying to describe. Yesterday, you had two amps “further down the line” from the multiplexer. Today, they’re “before the multiplexer.” And it’s not clear what’s connected to what.Gotcha... Thats not what Im asking. So we have the wah, pitch and volume " before the multiplexer" in rows 1-3. We then have amps "before the multiplexer" on 1 and 3. The multiplexer is going to affect the rows and everything in them.
So I think the answer is multiplexer #2