Yes the suhr sound like a Marshall cab and the two notes like a Mesa to resume my Impressions after watching some comparaisons
Try the Suhr. I have both and they are both killer, very similar, with the Suhr with a hair more presence to my ears.
I picked the second one as the amp because the bass is overhyped and the treble is dull which is exactly what an amp sounds like through Two Notes stuff.
One should note that the incorrect impedance curve of the Two Notes will exaggerate the pick attack, especially in the lower frequencies.
In general the test is flawed because the impedance curves used are very different. I could add a Torpedo impedance curve but I'd rather not support a product that is inherently inaccurate.
I wonder if it may already be thereWould it be feasible to add the Suhr impedance curve at some point?
I'd love to properly tone match my tube amps + Suhr reactive load with the models in the Axe so I can get a good reference tone before going to town on the advanced parameters.
I wonder if it may already be there
impedance list has
lb2 us lb2 uk and resistive load models is that maybe the Suhr or similar ?
But ? You still need a load box for doing this I mean you cannot plug your tube head to the axe directly so … where is the impedance curve located ? The one in the amp block where you chose recto straight or large or this or that ?Would it be feasible to add the Suhr impedance curve at some point?
I'd love to properly tone match my tube amps + Suhr reactive load with the models in the Axe so I can get a good reference tone before going to town on the advanced parameters.
But ? You still need a load box for doing this I mean you cannot plug your tube head to the axe directly so … where is the impedance curve located ? The one in the amp block where you chose recto straight or large or this or that ?
Ox Box uses the same inaccurate load as the Torpedo. The only accurate loads are the Fractal Audio LB-2 and the Suhr Reactive Load.
Yes. To be honest, it seems that gear like Ox box or Torpedo are like « Bose » in the Hifi world haha. Always sound good but not as accurate as professional stuff.Even the guys at Neural agrees with this as I've just read on TGP...
I do get it's a matter of preference if you like certain sound, and in the end isn't it what are we all chasing? If you like the punch the Torpedo gives, then more power to you. BUUUUT if it's a matter of comparing products for accuracy, then I do agree this is flawed from the beginning.
It's like the KRK rockit monitors series... sure they can sound punchy in store and in your home studio, but when compared to, let's say... a Focal Trio11 BE which gives you the exact representation of the audio you're hearing then either you like the clarity and definition it gives or you end up dissapointed because it doesn't sound as punchy because it doesn't overhype certain frequencies as the KRKs does...
This one is interesting
I prefer the sound of the torpedo in a mix, way more ba*** …bass sorry
But maybe out of the mix the suhr is clearer … hm . just add some extra treble in the torpedo so
It is so hard to keep a secret .
ok RESULTS only for this forum but shhhhh
1 is the axe
2 is the amp
so you see, the captor is not bad at all .
For the price, it does more than the job . (It’s not the x but the basic one)
The votes were 50/50
+1Wow - Those two Torpedo samples sound really bad. The top end is almost muted - I guess dull is the right description - It is not alive at all.