mrstrat
Experienced
So I've been feeling guilty about the original Axe/Triaxis/Matrix/2:90 shootout I did a while back:
http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-recordings/71121-triaxis-axe-shootout.html
in which I left everything the same, except changed out different pieces of equipment to do an apples-to-apples comparison. Axe vs. Triaxis, 2:90 vs. Matrix GT1000FX.
Anyway the Matrix recording came out sounding like poop on both the Triaxis and Axe versions, which I felt bad about, but I knew if I went back and did a little EQ tweaking, I could get it sounding good.
So, I posted a Axe vs. Triaxis shootout earlier today, and decided to go back and tweak the Matrix to see how close I could get to the other Axe/2:90 tone:
Matrix redeemed...
BTW, the Triaxis/2:90 is first, the Axe/2:90 is second, the Axe/Matrix is last.
http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-recordings/71121-triaxis-axe-shootout.html
in which I left everything the same, except changed out different pieces of equipment to do an apples-to-apples comparison. Axe vs. Triaxis, 2:90 vs. Matrix GT1000FX.
Anyway the Matrix recording came out sounding like poop on both the Triaxis and Axe versions, which I felt bad about, but I knew if I went back and did a little EQ tweaking, I could get it sounding good.
So, I posted a Axe vs. Triaxis shootout earlier today, and decided to go back and tweak the Matrix to see how close I could get to the other Axe/2:90 tone:
Matrix redeemed...
BTW, the Triaxis/2:90 is first, the Axe/2:90 is second, the Axe/Matrix is last.
Last edited: