Rumbletone
Inspired
So for items like saturation and drive in the mic preamp settings - these don’t actually model the behaviour of a preamp (for example, less headroom as it drives into saturation) and instead are just imparting a non-dynamic EQ curve to a signal regardless of its dynamics? And it doesn’t reflect the natural compression of a speaker as it is pushed to its dynamics limit?That matters for capturing the IR, not for using one.
IRs can only capture linear time-invariant processes, which does not describe a compressor. That's why I initially said that any compression in the Cab block can't be due to the IR unless it's a bug.
IRs are a particular way of implementing an EQ curve with a particular associated phase response, nothing more.
I’m new to Fractal gear, but I did some experiments with a clean boost in front of the cab block and if the drive and saturation of the mic pre were set relatively high it clearly seemed to top out on headroom and not get louder as I increased the gain of the upstream blocks (and I tested boost->cab->output, and the output clearly had lots of headroom available). And if I reduced the drive and saturation settings there was more headroom available (and the overall output from the cab block would be louder as I increased the output of the upstream blocks). So you’re saying the limiting must be happening elsewhere? And ideas where that limiting is happening if not in the cab block?