Hello,
I have lately decided to upgrade my current home studio environment in which I have used only guitar plugins to do all of my home recordings.
I decided to upgrade to Axe Fx but based on what I have read from the newest product, Axe III, I believe it would be an overkill for my current needs. The unit would only be for the purpose of home recordings and maybe in actual recording situations as well if needed.
There is alot of Axe Fx ultras and standards in the market near me, but I am willing to invest more that that so therefore I have excluded those from my options.
I have been looking for used models of the Axe II family and I have seen couple of Mark I's in the market near my location. I have understood that the differences between Mark I and II are not that big and between the Marks the XL, the difference is mostly the memory capacity in the XL. Also I have understood that there will be no updates in the Axe FX II family from now on, but the product is "mature" already? Based on all this, I posted a buying notification for the XL model, but without luck so far. However couple of Mark I's I have seen... This all have made wonder that are the differences in the Axe Fx II family that great based on my needs. My guitar rig for home recordings is really straight forward and I am not expecting to use all the different effects available etc. The features that I would value in the unit are the ease of use and good sounds with reasonable amount of options to choose from, thats it. In other words, should I wait until I find an XL or are all the II units suitable for my purposes?
Please excuse the inconvenience, I know that this topic has been talked alot but I still find myself stuck in deciding between the models and really understanding the meaning of them in the context of my needs. I would really appreciate some insights on the topic, thanks!
I have lately decided to upgrade my current home studio environment in which I have used only guitar plugins to do all of my home recordings.
I decided to upgrade to Axe Fx but based on what I have read from the newest product, Axe III, I believe it would be an overkill for my current needs. The unit would only be for the purpose of home recordings and maybe in actual recording situations as well if needed.
There is alot of Axe Fx ultras and standards in the market near me, but I am willing to invest more that that so therefore I have excluded those from my options.
I have been looking for used models of the Axe II family and I have seen couple of Mark I's in the market near my location. I have understood that the differences between Mark I and II are not that big and between the Marks the XL, the difference is mostly the memory capacity in the XL. Also I have understood that there will be no updates in the Axe FX II family from now on, but the product is "mature" already? Based on all this, I posted a buying notification for the XL model, but without luck so far. However couple of Mark I's I have seen... This all have made wonder that are the differences in the Axe Fx II family that great based on my needs. My guitar rig for home recordings is really straight forward and I am not expecting to use all the different effects available etc. The features that I would value in the unit are the ease of use and good sounds with reasonable amount of options to choose from, thats it. In other words, should I wait until I find an XL or are all the II units suitable for my purposes?
Please excuse the inconvenience, I know that this topic has been talked alot but I still find myself stuck in deciding between the models and really understanding the meaning of them in the context of my needs. I would really appreciate some insights on the topic, thanks!