yeky83
Power User
This thread started with the QC, but I'm not sure to what extent it's actually doing ML...? And to the extent it's doing ML, it's not the best at it as seen by comparisons to TONEX and NAM.
NAM's showing that it's producing results that almost null with its source. If the waveforms are close to nulling, then the response & feel are going to be there... unless response & feel are somehow immaterial quantities that are not reflected in waveforms
NAM's showing that it's producing results that almost null with its source. If the waveforms are close to nulling, then the response & feel are going to be there... unless response & feel are somehow immaterial quantities that are not reflected in waveforms