• We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.

    Please give yourself a refresher on the forum rules you agreed to follow when you signed up.

FC-6 and Increment/Decrement Preset via external switch

Thanks for your reply. Sorry I should have clarified. I meant a bank of 5 switches on the controller. How I currently use my mfc is the bottom 5 switches as presets, the rest as IA’s, some scenes, etc.

So with the FC, I am hoping to have the bottom row be presets, and then be able to bank either up and down to access to next or previous 6 presets. Hopefully that makes sense. I will certainly submit a wishlist item for this if it cannot be accomplished. Though I think I can adapt if this can’t be accomplished.

These controllers are truly impressive either way. I look forward to seeing them in action.
Don't forget that you have both tap and hold options for your switches.

You can make 2 switches that have a primary function on tap but then do bank Increment or Decrement on hold.
 
Don't forget that you have both tap and hold options for your switches.

You can make 2 switches that have a primary function on tap but then do bank Increment or Decrement on hold.

I will be using my FC primarily for live and want as many buttons for switching between various effects configurations as possible per preset. But of course, I will need to increment through the preset/set list. I’m trying to decide between the 6 and 12 and am reluctant to give up two buttons on the layout for dedicated increment up/down. I see elsewhere and in the manual that the external switch jacks, say with dual momentary switches and a TRS cannot currently do increment commands. Can anyone see a disadvantage to the hold “up” next preset on one button and hold “down” on another? I can imagine some limitations with the hold increment solution on the 6 while using the looper, unless a dedicated looper button could also be made to simultaneously change the layout into one which can make full use of all the multiple looper parameters. Is this possible?
 
Last edited:
I will be using my FC primarily for live and want as many buttons for switching between various effects configurations as possible per preset. But of course, I will need to increment through the preset/set list. I’m trying to decide between the 6 and 12 and am reluctant to give up two buttons on the layout for dedicated increment up/down. I see elsewhere and in the manual that the external switch jacks, say with dual momentary switches and a TRS cannot currently do increment commands. Can anyone see a disadvantage to the hold “up” next preset on one button and hold “down” on another? I can imagine some limitations with the hold increment solution on the 6 while using the looper, unless a dedicated looper button could also be made to simultaneously change the layout into one which can make full use of all the multiple looper parameters. Is this possible?
I don't see any issues with using the hold that way. You could also do as iaresee suggested and have a layout just for preset selection.

You can also have a layout for looper controls... And it could be triggered on either a tap or hold.
 
Dedicate an entire layout to selecting presets and just switch to that layout to make the preset changes?

Thanks for the suggestion, good to know, but if I have more than 6 presets in a set list, then I would need two pages or more right? That’s fine, but it seems like more steps to get to any particular preset than the other alternative I proposed. Aside from being able to see 6 song headings per page, what other advantages do you see to this approach?
 
Thanks for the suggestion, good to know, but if I have more than 6 presets in a set list, then I would need two pages or more right? That’s fine, but it seems like more steps to get to any particular preset than the other alternative I proposed. Aside from being able to see 6 song headings per page, what other advantages do you see to this approach?

FC-6 Layout 1 from the factory is a good preset picker - 4 presets and bank up/down switches.
 
I don't see any issues with using the hold that way. You could also do as iaresee suggested and have a layout just for preset selection.

You can also have a layout for looper controls... And it could be triggered on either a tap or hold.

Glad to hear that, the 6 seems like plenty of buttons if I take this approach. The catch is you have to remember which buttons have those 2 particular multiple functions, but if I keep the hold up and down on say the right two top/bottom buttons as the increment/decrement, and reserve those button’s tap functions for effects configurations which do not need multiple scenes or channels, then I haven’t given up anything by configuring the buttons this way, right?
 
Further on the subject of making the most of an FC6, I can use an external momentary switch for global settings like switching the tuner on/off, right?
 
Glad to hear that, the 6 seems like plenty of buttons if I take this approach. The catch is you have to remember which buttons have those 2 particular multiple functions, but if I keep the hold up and down on say the right two top/bottom buttons as the increment/decrement, and reserve those button’s tap functions for effects configurations which do not need multiple scenes or channels, then I haven’t given up anything by configuring the buttons this way, right?
Right.
 
Back
Top Bottom