Wish Dynamic EQ

We already have that. Pull up a Filter block, and tie one or more of the parameters to Envelope or ADSR.

That’s a nice idea but it’s not the same. As you describe it the entire spectrum is affecting the filter regardless of whether the specific frequency we’re reducing is present. The point of a dynamic EQ is that is only cuts the selected frequency when that frequency rises above a certain threshold.
 
That’s a nice idea but it’s not the same. As you describe it the entire spectrum is affecting the filter regardless of whether the specific frequency we’re reducing is present. The point of a dynamic EQ is that is only cuts the selected frequency when that frequency rises above a certain threshold.
Can't this be done with a multicomp?
 
Can't this be done with a multicomp?

Yes a multicomp does a similar thing. But a DEQ is different in that it like a PEQ it has adjustable frequencies rather than crossovers and usually more than the 3 bands. Most can also boost as well as cut frequencies and have adjustable Q. So it’s more useful for making finer adjustments or for creative effects.

One solution would be to add more bands, upwards compression and Q to the multicomp. But IMO it’s more intuitive to approach it as an EQ than a multicomp.
 
Yes a multicomp does a similar thing. But a DEQ is different in that it like a PEQ it has adjustable frequencies rather than crossovers and usually more than the 3 bands. Most can also boost as well as cut frequencies and have adjustable Q. So it’s more useful for making finer adjustments or for creative effects.

One solution would be to add more bands, upwards compression and Q to the multicomp. But IMO it’s more intuitive to approach it as an EQ than a multicomp.
Yes multicomp with more bands would be cool
 
We already have that. Pull up a Filter block, and tie one or more of the parameters to Envelope or ADSR.

Yes. Using the Envelope would produce the same result as a Dynamic EQ. Using ADSR would be more a kin to a multiband compression because of the time parameters.
 
Yes. Using the Envelope would produce the same result as a Dynamic EQ. Using ADSR would be more a kin to a multiband compression because of the time parameters.

It's not the same because the entire signal would activate the compression rather than only the specified frequency band. It would be possible if the envelope follower could look at the output of another filter that high- and low- passed above and below our specified frequency band but we can't. Also that would only work on one band whereas a DEQ usually has 5 or so bands.
 
It's not the same because the entire signal would activate the compression rather than only the specified frequency band. It would be possible if the envelope follower could look at the output of another filter that high- and low- passed above and below our specified frequency band but we can't. Also that would only work on one band whereas a DEQ usually has 5 or so bands.

You are right! My bad. Coffee hadn’t kicked in yet!
 
But a DEQ is different in that it like a PEQ it has adjustable frequencies rather than crossovers and usually more than the 3 bands. Most can also boost as well as cut frequencies and have adjustable Q.

there is sidechain capability in most of the compressors right? DEQ as you're describing it sounds just like a de-esser, just a compressor triggered from a sidechain where the sidechain is filtered to only let through the freq band you want to selectively boost/cut...
 
I work as a theater audio tech and use dynamic eq on a regular basis. It is not compressing, it is more like someone turning up or down your tone controls relative to your volume(above or below a threshold at how many dbs at what ratio, freq. and Q). It is a wonderful tool to use, the Digico SD series console I use has 4 bands of dynamic EQ. Ya, I could see this here on the III.
 
there is sidechain capability in most of the compressors right? DEQ as you're describing it sounds just like a de-esser, just a compressor triggered from a sidechain where the sidechain is filtered to only let through the freq band you want to selectively boost/cut...

It works sort of like a de-esser but it has a different purpose. If you haven't used one, don't approach it like a compressor even though some of the controls are the same. It's very much an EQing tool but more powerful than the conventional static EQs.

We currently have Dynamic Presence and Dynamic Depth in the Amp block which are the same idea, just with limited control. Play with them, they're pretty cool.

Do you want it for amp tone augmentation or for sound design?

Both, but does it matter?

For example:
-You have a tone that breaks up when you dig in. With a DEQ you could alter the character of the overdrive but leave the clean tone untouched.
-You have a tone that's boomy when you're playing down low but cutting low end makes higher notes sound weedy, you could cut the low frequencies only when they are problematic.
-You have an unpleasant overtone but you don't want to just make a blanket cut and leave a hole in the spectrum; ideally you'd only cut when it pokes its head out. Cue the DEQ.
-Have the EQ of your guitar change as you turn up/down the volume - you could use it as a virtual treble bleed for example.
-Take a feed from the vocalist and sidechain that to the DEQ, then when the vocals come in rather than reducing the overall volume of the guitar, reduce just the frequencies that conflict. Or do the same with a bass and the kick drum.
-Plenty of more creative uses that we won't know until people play with one.
 
How would this be different from adding an envelope controller to parameters in an EQ block?
 
Back
Top Bottom