bluessyndicate
Member
I used my FM9 live last night for the first time. Hoping to get some useful insights from your collective expertise and experience.
Had some problems with setting levels properly, and it was a difficult evening for the band overall, getting used to the new situation. Not sure how psyched they are for me to continue to pursue a digital modeler direct to FOH. Especially given the phenomenal tube amp tone for which I have been known for locally.
It was an adjustment for bandmates to mix my signal into their monitors. I expect they can figure that out.
Using my monitor (QSC K10) in front of me rather than having an amp behind me was “different” for everyone. I think I’ll try putting my QSC K10 behind me next time, as an amp would be.
After I set my Output2 level to give the mixer a unity level feed , as the soundman set my channel level, it seemed non linear. i.e. although the mixer had a strong FM9 signal, there was no sound until the channel slide was up at least half way, and then it came on way strong.
The level bump I get in my monitor did not seem to be the same level bump the audience got in the FOH.
I’m more interested in discussing items 3 and 4, although if anyone has something to say about 1 or 2, I’m grateful for all feedback. But it’s 3 and 4 that are the bigger issues for gaining acceptance in the use of my FM9.
Item 3, I’m guessing, is more an issue with the mixer than the FM9. The mixer may be having complications with some of it’s channels. Maybe the guy running the board was doing something wrong. I’m not sure whether he had zeroed things out from whatever had used that channel before. Never the less, if someone has experienced this non linear response in PA channel levels, that would be useful feedback.
Item 4 is my most pressing issue. I spent significant time at home using the preset level tool, and the scenario level tool to give myself what I thought were proper levels of bump for clean vs. rhythm vs solo settings. Additionally, I set the button layouts such that I could bump up or down 2db as needed on the fly… and I successfully used that layout to adjust things throughout the night. I’m told however that when I would kick in for a solo that I was coming in way hot. My experience was that the level bump was appropriate from what I could hear in my monitor, but apparently I was crushing the audience at times, or stepping on the vocals at times.
It was not feasible that my output 1 level was set near the same level as output 2. i.e. the stage volume could not be set to match the live volume, if that is critical for getting similar bump response from level 1 vs. level 2. As I write this it occurs to me that I could have set output 1 and 2 the same, and then the PA mixer could have been used to adjust my channel volume. But I’m not sure how important it is for output 1 and 2 to match. I only mention it because of comments about how the FM9 should be dialed in at gig level volume.
For reference, the patch I was using was the ODS 100, and the scenes were the clean, boosted clean and PAB for solo.
Happy to provide more details if needed, or answer questions about my process to uncover things I’ve done wrong.
I think the FM9 is an incredible piece of gear with fantastic options and flexibility. Kudos to Fractal, and all of you for the insights you share on youtube channels and here on the forum.
I’m appreciative for any and all insights.
Had some problems with setting levels properly, and it was a difficult evening for the band overall, getting used to the new situation. Not sure how psyched they are for me to continue to pursue a digital modeler direct to FOH. Especially given the phenomenal tube amp tone for which I have been known for locally.
It was an adjustment for bandmates to mix my signal into their monitors. I expect they can figure that out.
Using my monitor (QSC K10) in front of me rather than having an amp behind me was “different” for everyone. I think I’ll try putting my QSC K10 behind me next time, as an amp would be.
After I set my Output2 level to give the mixer a unity level feed , as the soundman set my channel level, it seemed non linear. i.e. although the mixer had a strong FM9 signal, there was no sound until the channel slide was up at least half way, and then it came on way strong.
The level bump I get in my monitor did not seem to be the same level bump the audience got in the FOH.
I’m more interested in discussing items 3 and 4, although if anyone has something to say about 1 or 2, I’m grateful for all feedback. But it’s 3 and 4 that are the bigger issues for gaining acceptance in the use of my FM9.
Item 3, I’m guessing, is more an issue with the mixer than the FM9. The mixer may be having complications with some of it’s channels. Maybe the guy running the board was doing something wrong. I’m not sure whether he had zeroed things out from whatever had used that channel before. Never the less, if someone has experienced this non linear response in PA channel levels, that would be useful feedback.
Item 4 is my most pressing issue. I spent significant time at home using the preset level tool, and the scenario level tool to give myself what I thought were proper levels of bump for clean vs. rhythm vs solo settings. Additionally, I set the button layouts such that I could bump up or down 2db as needed on the fly… and I successfully used that layout to adjust things throughout the night. I’m told however that when I would kick in for a solo that I was coming in way hot. My experience was that the level bump was appropriate from what I could hear in my monitor, but apparently I was crushing the audience at times, or stepping on the vocals at times.
It was not feasible that my output 1 level was set near the same level as output 2. i.e. the stage volume could not be set to match the live volume, if that is critical for getting similar bump response from level 1 vs. level 2. As I write this it occurs to me that I could have set output 1 and 2 the same, and then the PA mixer could have been used to adjust my channel volume. But I’m not sure how important it is for output 1 and 2 to match. I only mention it because of comments about how the FM9 should be dialed in at gig level volume.
For reference, the patch I was using was the ODS 100, and the scenes were the clean, boosted clean and PAB for solo.
Happy to provide more details if needed, or answer questions about my process to uncover things I’ve done wrong.
I think the FM9 is an incredible piece of gear with fantastic options and flexibility. Kudos to Fractal, and all of you for the insights you share on youtube channels and here on the forum.
I’m appreciative for any and all insights.