Maybe the Nebula is to show universe or universal ..It kinda been hinted at that all the resources are in place .maybe it is an outsource but to an American building facility that can mass produce.
Lower prices ,a multi product line Extreme ,Lite ,and mass distribution and products in stock ..
In addition the Axe Edit GUI release and a Huge firmware ver 11 release
I agree. I also have to wonder, if there was a new hardware unit about to be announced, how would Fractal keep it secret unless it hasn't gone to production yet? Somebody would have leaked something by now it seems to me at the factory that silk screens or labels the front panels, if not somewhere else in the chain. On the other hand, it's easy to make a circuit board for a retrofit or add on without the people at the factory that makes it even knowing what it will be used for.
First, I think people need to calm down. No matter what is announced, this is nobody's worse nightmare. I'm anxious to see what's next.Why would no one expect to see something new come out within the next 2 years?
Sounds cool! Never heard of the Nebula IRs. I own the Redwirez and use the exclusivelyOH MY FUCKING GOD!! Please please please tell me there's a nebula update???? I tried my ultra with the nebula IRs and that combo is the BOMB!!!
*crosses fingers*
Or all cabs updated to nebula programs??? Woah...
*creams pants*
FractalAudio said:2010 08 17:
I've yet to take a vacation this year. I'm currently finishing up the MFC-101 and two other projects that I can't talk about. I haven't had any time to work on Axe-Fx software.
2010 08 22:
My guess is the new Pod is using the new ADSP-21469 DSP. The fastest version runs at 450 MHz. It's a decent DSP for the price. About half as powerful as the TigerSHARC in my tests. My guess is they're using the 400 MHz version.
If it has two of them then it will rival a standard Axe-Fx in power. For the price it seems unlikely it will have two unless they really cheaped out on the rest of the parts.
2010 09 16: Should I buy axe-fx Ultra?
Firewire is on the way out. If we were to come out with a new version it would probably have USB.
No new version in the works though. Working on some other projects.
2010 09 18:
There is a new SHARC processor family: the 214xx series. My bet is the new Pod stuff is using a 21469.
I have evaluated the 21469 extensively and while it is a good processor it is only about half as powerful as a TigerSHARC. We are actually working on a new product based on the 21469.
The problem with the SHARCs is several things:
- The core design is very old. They are still using the same basic core from almost 20 years ago.
- The internal bus bandwidth is mediocre. The TigerSHARC has four 128-bit internal data buses that run at full speed which means the core is never starved for data.
- Too few registers. You have to constantly push and pop with the SHARCs because the register file is so small. This increases function overhead so either your functions run slower or you have to increase your block size (and concomitant latency). The TigerSHARC has a huge register file and since there are so many scratch registers you rarely have to save any registers on the stack (this can also be a disadvantage since you have to save all those registers during a context switch so you have to code your interrupts carefully).
- The SIMD implementation is crude. It would take too long to explain the details.
- Small internal memory. The maximum available is 5 Mb IIRC.
- 48-bit instruction word. The long instruction word means instruction use 1.5 times the memory as data does. So that 5 Mb memory is equivalent to 3.3 Mb in practice.
The new SHARCs have on-board accelerators (FIR and IIR). In theory this should be great but unfortunately the accelerators only work at half the clock speed so they don't really buy you much.
One advantage of the new SHARCs is the on-board peripherals. They include SPI, I2S, UARTS, etc. This reduces system cost. The TigerSHARC has no on-board peripherals, it is designed for one thing: number-crunching.
The SHARC is the value line and for the money the new SHARCs are great but a TigerSHARC still easily outperforms them.
2010 09 18:
Do any of you use AES/EBU (as opposed to SPDIF) in your studios (that's the digital XLR connector).
Doing some product research and wondering if anyone actually uses this anymore.
2010 12 17: Re: Hey Cliff ! Any new chrismas firmware ??
Don't expect anything ground-shaking. Just some minor stuff. We're working hard on Axe-Edit and a few other things.
Isn't the most detailed cab simulation called nebula?
Can anyone offer any speculation (wild or otherwise) as to how the expansion port on the MFC101 might figure into any of this?
No new version in the works though.