L
luke
Guest
Maybe I am over estimating the power of the control switch.
Scenario:
I am using all four amplifiers in the AMP block and other CPU usage prevents me from adding AMP2.
I want to control input drive in CH A and CH C, but different amounts since they are different amp types via modifiers assigned to CS 1 & CS 4.
I had set up using FC switch 3's (by per preset) hold to CS1 to alter CH A's amp.
I then added FC switch 5 to CS4 to alter CH C.
However I have come to realize when I changed the Modifier to CS4, even though in a different channel, it overrode and removed CS1 in the other channel.
If I try to use the secondary modifier, the flexibility to have two different states does not exist.
For example: One CH A I want input drive to start at 2 and go to 4, and on CH C I want input drive to go from 3 to 5.
Scenario:
I am using all four amplifiers in the AMP block and other CPU usage prevents me from adding AMP2.
I want to control input drive in CH A and CH C, but different amounts since they are different amp types via modifiers assigned to CS 1 & CS 4.
I had set up using FC switch 3's (by per preset) hold to CS1 to alter CH A's amp.
I then added FC switch 5 to CS4 to alter CH C.
However I have come to realize when I changed the Modifier to CS4, even though in a different channel, it overrode and removed CS1 in the other channel.
If I try to use the secondary modifier, the flexibility to have two different states does not exist.
For example: One CH A I want input drive to start at 2 and go to 4, and on CH C I want input drive to go from 3 to 5.