Tsunamijuan
Inspired
So I have been using my II-XL for about 5 years now (3 years in the band). Which has been great but I am starting to need more I/O channels. Like needing the ability to have some send and returns for external pedals.
I can't really use output two as an fx loop on my current setup. Due to a mix of band politics so I can have my in ear setup independent of everything. Also with the passing of one of our guitarists. I am needing to fill more sonic space than I previously did.
My concern is that I primarily use the "FAS Bass" amp block, as my main amp. Does anyone know of any glaring difference between the modeling and behavior in the II-XL too the III. That would force me to stick with the older unit. I figured someone else might have some experience with this, and potentially save me some trouble. Or something else that might be a glaring difference between the units behavior.
Thanks in advance to everyone taking the time to read this and potentially respond, its greatly appreciated.
I can't really use output two as an fx loop on my current setup. Due to a mix of band politics so I can have my in ear setup independent of everything. Also with the passing of one of our guitarists. I am needing to fill more sonic space than I previously did.
My concern is that I primarily use the "FAS Bass" amp block, as my main amp. Does anyone know of any glaring difference between the modeling and behavior in the II-XL too the III. That would force me to stick with the older unit. I figured someone else might have some experience with this, and potentially save me some trouble. Or something else that might be a glaring difference between the units behavior.
Thanks in advance to everyone taking the time to read this and potentially respond, its greatly appreciated.