R.D. said:O.K. Mark,
That’s awesome ( as usual ), but it struck me how smooth you make it look. Your technique is very consistent from beginning to end …. Damn, I wish mine was ! I’m envious ….
I’ve got a question …. You might have answered it in one of your other threads already, but if you did, it’s buried somewhere and I just haven’t found it !
But, what are you getting ( in the recording sound wise ) from each of the three ( 3 ) differrent sources that the “Axe-direct” wouldn’t do alone ? Extra bite, extra thump, extra body, etc; etc; ?
And if you could assign a %’tage to how much of each are you using ( ie; 50% Axe-direct, 35% SM-57 & 15% Edirol, etc; etc; …. ) ? What would it be ?
I know your time is at a premium right now, but I’d be interested to hear a short clip of each solo’ed to see what they’re adding ?
Thanks –
Hey Roger:
Usually recordings are thickened up by using different amps, guitars, mics, etc on different tracks and different takes and combining them. In order to get the thickest sound possible I have been experimenting with different sources and combining them even though I am doing just one take. By combining the different sources it gives the recording a "louder" sound. Just as some of the best sounding clips here are combined tracks using slightly different amp sims or speaker IR's or even just different mic models.
Here is the approximate %:
Direct 65%
Edirol 25%
SM57 10%
If you want to hear an example....in the first part of the BATM video I did, I explain that I overdubbed a part during the end of the first solo 29secs-37secs in the video, I also go on to explain that I overdubbed the end solo (50secs-58secs)...when I am explaining those parts what you hear is JUST the Edirol source because at the time my PT's is NOT recording so it is not picking up the SM57 or the direct source. It sounds very "room" and when combined with the direct source and close miked 57, the Edirol source will add a little "ambience" to the tracks.
Mark