jerotas
Experienced
Ok, I still have the Vetta. Glad I didn't sell it. Today I had a friend over and I played through the Axe-Fx straight into my 2 Behringer B212A active monitors. He played through my Vetta Head into 2 Bogner 1x12's.
I've had the Vetta 5 years. I've dialed up some pretty awesome dual tones on the thing. And Bogner speakers are just unbeatable for richness and clarity of tone. I have the CL-80 speakers in them instead of whatever comes stock.
Amp models - I think the Vetta sounds less authentic to the amps it copies than the Axe-Fx. But that does not mean that it sounds worse - just different. Admittedly, there is a level of articulation that I get on the Axe-Fx amp models that just is not attainable on the Vetta.
Obviously, the chrouses, reverb, and delays on the Axe-Fx are superior. As are the routing choices. I really do love the clean tones on the Axe-Fx.
After A/B'ing them for about an hour, I still prefer - by far - certain distorted tones of the Vetta over anything I've dialed up in the Axe-Fx. I definitely wish the Vetta models had the level of articulation that the Axe-Fx models do. With the Vetta, I can get the perfect combination of crunch (clarity) and thump. Haven't been able to do that yet with the Axe.
So far my favorite lead channel on the Axe is the Mesa Mark 4 lead preset, slightly EQ'd for a bit more crunch. It does FEEL better to play on then the Vetta. But it doesn't SOUND as good as my Bogner Uberschall / Diezel Herbert lead sound on the Vetta. I've tried plugging the Axe-Fx into a power amp and the Bogners too, but I haven't been able to beat my setup with the Axe.
Possibly I need to tweak more. Or maybe I just have to make the choice of sound vs. feel. I wouldn't ever get rid of the Axe. But it may become a recording-only component for me. I wanted to gig with it, but it would have to beat the Vetta hands down. Right now I don't think it does.
Anyone live by Seattle? We could have a tweaking party haha.
I've had the Vetta 5 years. I've dialed up some pretty awesome dual tones on the thing. And Bogner speakers are just unbeatable for richness and clarity of tone. I have the CL-80 speakers in them instead of whatever comes stock.
Amp models - I think the Vetta sounds less authentic to the amps it copies than the Axe-Fx. But that does not mean that it sounds worse - just different. Admittedly, there is a level of articulation that I get on the Axe-Fx amp models that just is not attainable on the Vetta.
Obviously, the chrouses, reverb, and delays on the Axe-Fx are superior. As are the routing choices. I really do love the clean tones on the Axe-Fx.
After A/B'ing them for about an hour, I still prefer - by far - certain distorted tones of the Vetta over anything I've dialed up in the Axe-Fx. I definitely wish the Vetta models had the level of articulation that the Axe-Fx models do. With the Vetta, I can get the perfect combination of crunch (clarity) and thump. Haven't been able to do that yet with the Axe.
So far my favorite lead channel on the Axe is the Mesa Mark 4 lead preset, slightly EQ'd for a bit more crunch. It does FEEL better to play on then the Vetta. But it doesn't SOUND as good as my Bogner Uberschall / Diezel Herbert lead sound on the Vetta. I've tried plugging the Axe-Fx into a power amp and the Bogners too, but I haven't been able to beat my setup with the Axe.
Possibly I need to tweak more. Or maybe I just have to make the choice of sound vs. feel. I wouldn't ever get rid of the Axe. But it may become a recording-only component for me. I wanted to gig with it, but it would have to beat the Vetta hands down. Right now I don't think it does.
Anyone live by Seattle? We could have a tweaking party haha.