Does too. :xPorkchop Xpress said:chrisallen8888 said:i don't even know why it matters if it's flat or not.
It doesn't.
Does too. :xPorkchop Xpress said:chrisallen8888 said:i don't even know why it matters if it's flat or not.
It doesn't.
Clark Kent said:[quote="Jay Mitchell":2xohlpzd]No. It's proof that you've made a mistake.
s0c9 said:Do you have any idea who Jay is or what he does for a living ?? :?: :?:
I suggest you do some further research before removing your hoof from your mouth! :roll:
Clark Kent said:s0c9 said:Do you have any idea who Jay is or what he does for a living ?? :?: :?:
I suggest you do some further research before removing your hoof from your mouth! :roll:
Who Jay is, has nothing to do with this topic. Yes I know Jay must've done something big as he repeatedly loves to mention but all I can find is guitar lessons so what went wrong? In this topic Jay is not a nice guy nor has he ever been on this forum and we all know this. If he was a good guy he would've simply helped me like "try doing this and this to get it flat". Instead he wants to be egocentric and make the thread all about how good and magnificent he is. He's a basic case of a guy who isn't pleased with his self image so he gets satisfaction by setting himself above other people on a forum like we've seen happened countless times. Sorry but that seems really sad to me.
Let's stop this topic since it's not going anywhere. And btw Jay's spectrum wasn't flat either. And about me making an ass out of myself. No... I don't feel embarrassed. I'm one of the good guys on this forum and I'm sure most of you agree. I help people out without trying to make things revolve around me.
Scott Peterson said:http://www.google.com/search?q=jay+mitc ... =firefox-a[/url]
As for the 'I might be wrong... but Jay is mean' tact of playing this now - that's BS. You step into the arena with data that is incorrect, spread it as fact and are told that you need to redo it and why. We've all seen this play out before. If you don't like Jay's communication skill-set, so be it. But show me one time he's ever been wrong on a factual basis of which he posts about. Even once. I've been around for over 3 years, Jay was here at least as long. You might not agree with his opinion on things, but when it comes to facts related to his expertise on speakers and all things speakers... it's like a weekend driver telling a race car driver he doesn't know how to drive his race car.
It's called an "ad hominem" attack - attack the man when the facts fail to prove your premise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem[/quote:29ne9cb3]
Thank you, Scott - my thoughts too. This is a maybe an opportunity to learn how to ask questions vs. making statements or masquerading statements as questions. Just because Jay does not wrap his help in pleasant paper, it does not mean he is offensive. I think the greater man would accept the opportunity to evolve vs. defend and attack.
Scott Peterson said:As for the 'I might be wrong... but Jay is mean' tact of playing this now - that's BS. You step into the arena with data that is incorrect, spread it as fact and are told that you need to redo it and why. We've all seen this play out before. If you don't like Jay's communication skill-set, so be it. But show me one time he's ever been wrong on a factual basis of which he posts about. Even once. I've been around for over 3 years, Jay was here at least as long. You might not agree with his opinion on things, but when it comes to facts related to his expertise on speakers and all things speakers... it's like a weekend driver telling a race car driver he doesn't know how to drive his race car.
Clark Kent said:And btw Jay's spectrum wasn't flat either.
That's debatable...Clark Kent said:I help people out without trying to make things revolve around me.
Physicist.eda123 said:Jay is an engineer
Loudspeaker R&D, manufacturing, customer support (I own the company), technical instruction, authoring of technical articles and reference texts. And, oh, BTW, playing gigs on guitar, bass, and vocals.or does something highly technical I imagine.
There are two types of people in the world: those who attempt to categorize others, and those who do not. :lol:You have two classes,
Not a "right," in this case, an obligation.Do people have a right to dispute incorrect statements?
I find your selective quotation (and emphasis) interesting. I quote from CK's post just above that one:You can say "IM SICK OF THIS CRAP, YOU ARE WRONG..."
There are two types of people in the world: those who attempt to categorize others, and those who do not. :lol:Jay Mitchell said:Physicist.eda123 said:Jay is an engineer
Loudspeaker R&D, manufacturing, customer support (I own the company), technical instruction, authoring of technical articles and reference texts. And, oh, BTW, playing gigs on guitar, bass, and vocals.or does something highly technical I imagine.
[quote:1g6arhmm]You have two classes,
Not a "right," in this case, an obligation.Do people have a right to dispute incorrect statements?
I find your selective quotation (and emphasis) interesting. I quote from CK's post just above that one:You can say "IM SICK OF THIS CRAP, YOU ARE WRONG..."
That's the objective.eda123 said:You may end up correcting facts,
Correct. It's called "finite patience." Guilty as charged. :lol:but you do so with an attitude,
eda123 said:1) Those that have awful social skills. They dispute every fact, every point. They look down upon those around them. They tear people down who ask for help. They are condescending. They are unpleasant to most people. These types often are kept around purely for thier mind, and are stuffed in a corner by themselves- this is where they prefer to be, and where most people would rather have them. A bit of a God complex.