flash6
Inspired
FAS Buttery amp and new Drive Maxoff 808 and VS9
preset MF Buttery downloadable on G66.eu
Really well done. Thanks @Marco Fanton
FAS Buttery amp and new Drive Maxoff 808 and VS9
preset MF Buttery downloadable on G66.eu
FAS Buttery amp and new Drive Maxoff 808 and VS9
preset MF Buttery downloadable on G66.eu
FAS Buttery amp and new Drive Maxoff 808 and VS9
preset MF Buttery downloadable on G66.eu
Quick little fullres demo
Strange stuff. No issues with Tuner on this version for me. Muting and working fine when activating from FC6 or from front panel. However, I wasn't able to update from the Fractal bot unless I had the downloaded version on my desktop. Oh well, no worries. It's all working fine at this point so no complaints!When activating the tuner in Axe-edit it doesn't mute anymore, I checked and it's set to mute output. A bug or am I missing something?
Really loving the FullRez IR currently, they are awesome!
On the other hand, they consume A LOT of CPU/DSP power. Looking at the graph of these FullRez IRs room IRs:
1. Normal IR contains little infor after 6ms.
2. FullRez IR contains little infor before 6ms.
I wonder if there is certain optimization one can do on the processing of the FullRez IR, which take advantage of the fact there is little info before 6ms and hence only process the latter half of the FullRez IR before mixing with the normal IR, as a result we'd save a good chunk of CPU...
Is this possible or completely wishful thinking? @FractalAudio
View attachment 89571
That 6 ms is only about half a percent of the total IR length of the FullRes IR, so I'm not sure it would really make that much difference in the CPU load, but who knows. Every little bit helps.Really loving the FullRez IR currently, they are awesome!
On the other hand, they consume A LOT of CPU/DSP power. Looking at the graph of these FullRez IRs room IRs:
1. Normal IR contains little infor after 6ms.
2. FullRez IR contains little infor before 6ms.
I wonder if there is certain optimization one can do on the processing of the FullRez IR, which take advantage of the fact there is little info before 6ms and hence only process the latter half of the FullRez IR before mixing with the normal IR, as a result we'd save a good chunk of CPU...
Is this possible or completely wishful thinking? @FractalAudio
View attachment 89571
https://forum.fractalaudio.com/threads/is-the-mk-i-now-a-little-outdated.177303/post-2157838Really loving the FullRez IR currently, they are awesome!
On the other hand, they consume A LOT of CPU/DSP power. Looking at the graph of these FullRez IRs room IRs:
1. Normal IR contains little infor after 6ms.
2. FullRez IR contains little infor before 6ms.
I wonder if there is certain optimization one can do on the processing of the FullRez IR, which take advantage of the fact there is little info before 6ms and hence only process the latter half of the FullRez IR before mixing with the normal IR, as a result we'd save a good chunk of CPU...
Is this possible or completely wishful thinking? @FractalAudio
View attachment 89571
That's a different issue, Cliff was talking about fixing a CPU usage regression for patches NOT using FullRez IRs.