• We would like to remind our members that this is a privately owned, run and supported forum. You are here at the invitation and discretion of the owners. As such, rules and standards of conduct will be applied that help keep this forum functioning as the owners desire. These include, but are not limited to, removing content and even access to the forum.

    Please give yourself a refresher on the forum rules you agreed to follow when you signed up.

Axe-Fx III Firmware Release Version 17.00 Public Beta

sprint

Axe-Master


I recorded this in the looper, the first play is with the pitch block enabled, the second with pitch block disabled. Recorded on a Strat neck pickup w/ volume at 7.

K - I can definitely hear it in your clip - I usually use virtual capo with distortion so I guess it is more evident clean. I narrowed the patch down to just Input > looper > pitch > output and tried various tracking options but same thing. It's particularly appearant straight through with no amp/cab block - hear below (no VC on 1st strum, VC on 2nd). Not sure it is a bug though as it may just be the nature of the beast with generated pitch shifted tones - it's one of those fx where even the best of the best does not sound that good to me raw.

 

Randalljax

Fractal Fanatic
K - I can definitely hear it in your clip - I usually use virtual capo with distortion so I guess it is more evident clean. I narrowed the patch down to just Input > looper > pitch > output and tried various tracking options but same thing. It's particularly appearant straight through with no amp/cab block - hear below (no VC on 1st strum, VC on 2nd). Not sure it is a bug though as it may just be the nature of the beast with generated pitch shifted tones - it's one of those fx where even the best of the best does not sound that good to me raw.


That does almost sound like a tremolo is on although its not , maybe a bug
 

sprint

Axe-Master
That does almost sound like a tremolo is on although its not , maybe a bug
ya - that was thru my interface with some reverb - took that out and routed direct to daw via usb - same thing - maybe someone else can try with mkii and see if it's the same..

edit: and via headphones to axefx - same.
 
Last edited:

moonboy

New Member
Apologies if that's already been suggested, I'm short on time and can't read the whole thread. Re: Mark I machines, isn't the obvious solution to offer firmware versions (or some sort of preference somewhere in the settings?) to let the user decide if they want to sacrifice the user 2 IR for the full res IRs?
 

TSJMajesty

Fractal Fanatic
I added the second IR Player block back in. I had finagle things a bit to make everything fit in L2 but this had a serendipitous side-effect of reducing CPU usage a little.
That's cool. This is a reason why I prefer to wait until the release versions are available. (But I do appreciate the guys who discover the issues.)
 

chris

Legend!
Apologies if that's already been suggested, I'm short on time and can't read the whole thread. Re: Mark I machines, isn't the obvious solution to offer firmware versions (or some sort of preference somewhere in the settings?) to let the user decide if they want to sacrifice the user 2 IR for the full res IRs?
Splitting firmware into multiple current versions is a support nightmare, and an end-user issue as well. I doubt we’ll ever see that, and rarely see it in any other gear.
 

Deasnutz

Member
Splitting firmware into multiple current versions is a support nightmare, and an end-user issue as well. I doubt we’ll ever see that, and rarely see it in any other gear
You might have to explain this “end-user issue” to me. Yes, it would require more support.
 
Top Bottom