Rock Chalk
Fractal Fanatic
Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run whatever goodies the user chooses without over taxing the cpu.
Is this really an issue today? Yes I have to get a little strategic with a crazy kitchen sink preset but following some basic cpu saving strategies, I can keep it below 80%.Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run whatever goodies the user chooses without over taxing the cpu.
Ummm, if you want to run two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths then yes, it is an issue today….. that’s what I meant by “whatever goodies the user chooses”. Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run everything it has without going over.Is this really an issue today?
This will never be true, whether it’s an AFX4, 5, 6, 7-Ultra, whatever. One guess why that is.Ummm, if you want to run two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths then yes, it is an issue today….. that’s what I meant by “whatever goodies the user chooses”. Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run everything it has without going over.
+1 - Not sure Axefx ever was, or will be, designed to run all options at once - there's just too many possibilities for that, though, I am amazed at the volume of goodies that can be crammed into 1 preset. To get a massive kitchen sink preset with literally everything in it, spdif multuple units together.This will never be true, whether it’s an AFX4, 5, 6, 7-Ultra, whatever. One guess why that is.
How many real world two amp rigs duplicate pitch, modulation, and reverb using discreet signal chains on both amps?Ummm, if you want to run two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths then yes, it is an issue today….. that’s what I meant by “whatever goodies the user chooses”. Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run everything it has without going over.
limited?, realistic perhaps - as I said above, there already is unlimited simultaneous processing available - you just need to string together multiple Axefx units - have at 'er! - but, with just 1, Axe3 does smash any competition for running variations within one patch.Wow…some pretty limited thinking on some of these replies concerning how this world-class competitor-smashing modeler should be used.
As you were fellas……lol.
You can set up two "reasonable and quite glorious" two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths in the III right now. If you really need two kitchen sink signal paths, you could just buy another III. An Axe FX IV that could do all that in one box would probably end up costing the same.Ummm, if you want to run two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths then yes, it is an issue today….. that’s what I meant by “whatever goodies the user chooses”. Hopefully the Axe 4 will have the capability to run everything it has without going over.
Not to nitpick, but it wouldn't cost the same. Lol More? Yes. But no where near $4500ish.You can set up two "reasonable and quite glorious" two-amp presets with totally separate signal paths in the III right now. If you really need two kitchen sink signal paths, you could just buy another III. An Axe FX IV that could do all that in one box would probably end up costing the same.
You're probably right. I was speaking over my pay-grade.Not to nitpick, but it wouldn't cost the same. Lol More? Yes. But no where near $4500ish.
The Bugatti Veyron is a world-class competitor-smashing vehicle, but I wouldn't try to fly one to the moon. Nor would I want to go rock crawling in Moab with it. The best of everything has its limits.Wow…some pretty limited thinking on some of these replies concerning how this world-class competitor-smashing modeler should be used.
As you were fellas……lol.
Yep, and I’d be pretty disappointed knowing my new Veyron could go 267, but Bugatti decided to gear it to only hit 225…..The Bugatti Veyron is a world-class competitor-smashing vehicle, but I wouldn't try to fly one to the moon. Nor would I want to go rock crawling in Moab with it. The best of everything has its limits.
Bugatti wouldn't stop you from running it at 267, but they put the red lines on the tach/speedometer to let you know when your approaching the limit and can expect some possible "shudder" - - but it won't go 300 as some enthusiasts want even though Bugatti could probably produce one at a $loss that goes 300 for the few that want it - and purchasing a 2nd one doesn't really get you to 300 either.Yep, and I’d be pretty disappointed knowing my new Veyron could go 267, but Bugatti decided to gear it to only hit 225…..
I was going to leave it alone but you just had to suck me back in, didn’t you?……lol……..it’s all good though.
No one’s looking for 300 here, just the 267, I promise officer.Bugatti wouldn't stop you from running it at 267, but they put the red lines on the tach/speedometer to let you know when your approaching the limit and can expect some possible "shudder" - - but it won't go 300 as some enthusiasts want even though Bugatti could probably produce one at a $loss that goes 300 for the few that want it - and purchasing a 2nd one doesn't really get you to 300 either.
You mean closed-mindedSomeday someone will want to be able to run 20 delays. Someone really open minded. Then what? Axe FX Mk 63?
to the contrary good sir - high flying renegade outlaw kitchen sinker here - but I have felt the heat of the sun on my wings, and adjusted my presets to avert fiery plummets back to earth.
View attachment 85372