rhummellh
Experienced
Camilo, for now just have unplug FC-6/12 to do changes via new axe edit version and plug back in for use. Or use front axe panel obviouslyVery slow here too! I'm sure it will be fixed in no time. Thanks for the great work!
Camilo, for now just have unplug FC-6/12 to do changes via new axe edit version and plug back in for use. Or use front axe panel obviouslyVery slow here too! I'm sure it will be fixed in no time. Thanks for the great work!
good tip! thanks!Camilo, for now just have unplug FC-6/12 to do changes via new axe edit version and plug back in for use. Or use front axe panel obviously
Issue for most was coding for the FC which is in work. Imagine would be a future FC update. Have you had a chance to play with the new updates? They are bad ass! Leon already did a video on it. Stack/hold, Ultra reverb, etc.good tip! thanks!
In other contexts, RC = the best cola....Release Candidate
"Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu.I found a bug: The VCO type is not displaying in the phaser block. It's just a blank box.
That solved it! Funny, I've never had to do that manually before. The automatic "reading block definitions" thing has always been enough after updates."Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu.
Yes, and the attenuation parameter in gate is missing too but that's expectedNo "Boiiinng" parameter in the Reverb block ...
Maybe it's because it's a beta ?
Not to nit, but it'd save a lot of people asking this if Axe-Edit remembered the firmware version it had loaded, and refreshed automatically if the attached device was on a different version, maybe only a higher one."Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu.
That's what it doesNot to nit, but it'd save a lot of people asking this if Axe-Edit remembered the firmware version it had loaded, and refreshed automatically if the attached device was on a different version, maybe only a higher one.
So why do so many people ask questions whose answer is to "Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu, like you just replied?That's what it does
Because they used a beta firmware then went to release firmware which has the same version number maybeSo why do so many people ask questions whose answer is to "Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu, like you just replied?
Because people run beta firmware. If you're running firmware 3.3 Beta 1 and you then load 3.3 Beta 2, you're still on 3.3, so the editor won't know to that the firmware has changed.So why do so many people ask questions whose answer is to "Refresh after new FW" from the Settings menu, like you just replied?
The version communicated only has the major and minor number and a flag indicating beta or notHmmm, so the firmware version communicated to the editor has less resolution than the actual formate version? Does that need to be true?
So only noobs want their software to figure out basic arithmetic, and update itself to match the environment it's actually in? Ok, sign me upThe version communicated only has the major and minor number and a flag indicating beta or not
People using beta versions are not supposed to be noobs...
That's not basic arithmetic : beta iterations are not numbered in the version information sent to AxeEditSo only noobs want their software to figure out basic arithmetic, and update itself to match the environment it's actually in? Ok, sign me up
Don't mean to make a big deal out of this, it's not. Fixing it for real doesn't seem like it would be either.
So the most real fix relies on both sides, firmware and software.That's not basic arithmetic : beta iterations are not numbered in the version information sent to AxeEdit
Could be, but tbh this is a very minor problem.So the most real fix relies on both sides, firmware and software.