Sorry, what? I believe the AX8 is also cheaper than the AxeFX Ultra (discontinued for many years), so by your logic that one should get updates before the AX8 as well?
Programming DSP is different from any OS-frame programming.There is no OS to organize memory, or to stop wrong phisical address istruction. So basically if you have different memory and CPU, you have a brand new code. You can organize the code to be partly re-used, but is add costrain and slow down machine. All is up to the programmer.But isn't it double work? First porting the code to one platform and next porting to another platform with different capabilities.
Programming DSP is different from any OS-frame programming.There is no OS to organize memory, or to stop wrong phisical address istruction.
..
Cliff even commented I kept running out of CPU.
Tigershark is Analog, not TI.Not true. Afaik TI provides an RTOS for its current DSP products which even supports Posix like APIs.
I Think both of them!Not CPU, but memory. The AX8 hasn't run up against this limit yet.
Tigershark is Analog, not TI.
More than will ever be used.
Because the Axe FX II first got 'some' of the Ares stuff under the hood of the Quantum FW, then was later when he went full ARES for it...
What does porting "some" of the ares modeling even mean? Only certain amps? Or...?