lukather
Inspired
I know his sister
I think Brian would blow all there minds in one go !!! Lol
I know his sister
Amazing what academic field your old band mates end up in.I think Brian would blow all there minds in one go !!! Lol
The Casimir effect is real and can be measured in the lab. There have also been many particle accelerator/collider experiments done since the 90s that have proven these particle pairs can be generated on demand albeit with a large amount of energy input input into the system to induce the quantum fluctuations to a measurable extent.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/something-from-nothing-vacuum-can-yield-flashes-of-light/
https://physics.aps.org/story/v2/st28
I have to wonder how much human perception plays into all of this? What if what we perceive as reality is actually sampled and quantized slices by our brain, the missing information between samples could be vast and explain why we can't really predict anything and explains why we only have probability. Perhaps the energy source(s) that drive the universe are pulsed or are waves and our version of reality exists in a tiny sampled area of those phenomenon. All of the other information or potential sample locations could be other realities existing along side or right on top of this one. Actions in this reality version could trigger changes in the co-existing and vice versa. The energy field that powers all of this could have fluctuations and if there are more than one source that could create some really complex interactions. There has to be consistency in the energy field(s) because we see stability in our version of reality, at least for the brief moment of human existence.
The fascinating thing for me is how every bit of this falls apart when you throw life into any of these theories. We can study and record the action of particles and form theories about them. Still, there exists these collections of particles (us) that can manipulate and change other particles into completely different versions at will? Then there is all of these molecular machines inside of us that convert atoms and particles to different versions which sustain a larger mass of atoms that stick together and roam around interacting with other masses of particles, that are completely different but have an attraction to do similar things in a nearly infinite set of possibilities!
Einstein disdained any formal religion or a God to be answerable to. He believed in Spinoza's God who is indifferent and takes no part in his creation after he created it. Kind like "wind up the universe and let it go" and be on his merry way.
What I meant was popping in and out of existence from "absolute nothing". Whereas Krauss struggles to justify this quantum nothing as "nothing" and a "nothing" that credibly explains universes popping into existence out of this "nothing" and the process being perfectly "natural".
"Empty space is actually full of quark-and-gluon field fluctuations"
What this is saying is that space "Is Not Empty" lol....yet it's called "Empty space"
According to string theory there is a lot going on everywhere, in a very tiny 'space' of six dimensions. At some point three of nine tiny dimensions got away from the rest and began to expand and have never stopped expanding, while the remaining six dimensions remain locked at that tiny 'space' way smaller than a proton. The vibrations in all nine dimensions define the characteristics of the various 'particles'.
I'm assuming you are referencing the Calibi-Yau manifold construct of space-time geometry. I've literally read Shing-Tung Yau's book 4 times and still don't fully understand it. It's amazing that any human can visualize 10 dimensions. While I can follow the math, I still cannot begin to grasp the physical construct of it all. It's one of those things that, to me, exists only on paper. Yet, there are gifted individuals out there who can actually visualize these concepts. Mind blowing.
Einstein said he was no smarter than anyone else, it was just he didn't give up on a problem until it was solved. He also said imagination was better than education. We are made of the very stuff that we think of in these studies, so how can we not be pulled toward the truth?
Something really triggered great thinking in the late 1700's and early 1800's (quality universities and information organization/curation?), then the next generation around the late 1800's and early 1900's took that to the next level. People are still taking those things up another notch every day.
Gravity itself does not attract matter... matter attracts matter. Rather, matter results in a gravitational field due to warping of space-time. But you are correct that antimatter would be equally affected by the known forces that affect regular ....
The gravity variable is where they got it wrong... since they haven't mastered the topic....safe to say.
So they can't test any ideas.. which is the missing link. Gravity does in fact attract matter... per law of equal and opposite attraction.
Might better just keep the space odyssey for asteroid hunting and get a better grasp on gravity.
I would prefer to visit the anti gravity room as opposed to a risky expensive trip into space.
Then we could develop advanced propulsion systems like warp speed.
Because I was looking this stuff up in google, now I am getting new feeds on the subject. But I'm not getting anything on divine intervention. Science is winning.
Because I was looking this stuff up in google, now I am getting new feeds on the subject. But I'm not getting anything on divine intervention. Science is winning.
As it should...
Yep... just like T-Rex.there is no battle ....empirical evidence is empirical evidence.
True religion and religious have no qualms with theories and observations.
The issues come into play in the interpretations of observations (empirical evidence).
When an interpretation is favored or given preference over another interpretation that is equally valid or more so....this is where the struggles take place.
True religion and religious have no qualms with theories and observations.
The issues come into play in the interpretations of observations (empirical evidence).
When an interpretation is favored or given preference over another interpretation that is equally valid or more so....this is where the struggles take place.
A particle can become a wave and then back into a particle.
What is 'true religion'?
Some interpretations are more likely than others. And if this interpretation can be validated through experiments and predicitions its the preferred interpretation. At least until something doesn't add up.