Last edited by a moderator:
scarr said:I added a warning about the renamer since it'll violate the warranty. That needs to be explicit, especially since we're on the FAS site now.
bmi said:Ready to provide the new 1024 sysex IRs??
Perhaps too early
Albert????
AlbertA said:Here's a preliminary version to convert IR's in wav format to 6.0 format version. It will complain about sysex files done for previous firmware.
Remember to put the cab block in the correct user slot that you want to use and then send the IR. If you currently have it in a factory cab and you send an IR, I believe it goes by default to User 1.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... v6beta.jar
AlbertA said:Here's a preliminary version to convert IR's in wav format to 6.0 format version. It will complain about sysex files done for previous firmware.
Remember to put the cab block in the correct user slot that you want to use and then send the IR. If you currently have it in a factory cab and you send an IR, I believe it goes by default to User 1.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... v6beta.jar
Clawfinger said:AlbertA said:Here's a preliminary version to convert IR's in wav format to 6.0 format version. It will complain about sysex files done for previous firmware.
Remember to put the cab block in the correct user slot that you want to use and then send the IR. If you currently have it in a factory cab and you send an IR, I believe it goes by default to User 1.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... v6beta.jar
So how would you say the Rectangular truncation works with the new IR's?
AlbertA said:Here's a preliminary version to convert IR's in wav format to 6.0 format version. It will complain about sysex files done for previous firmware.
Remember to put the cab block in the correct user slot that you want to use and then send the IR. If you currently have it in a factory cab and you send an IR, I believe it goes by default to User 1.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... v6beta.jar
I will regret the old version for the windowing option...it gives interesting different sounds for the cab.AlbertA said:New version up, I removed the windowing options as the Axe-Fx does its own windowing now.
Also you can open up old IR sysex files and it will convert them to the new format for you.
I also added a batch processing support as well for both wav and sysx files - to use just choose a file in the directory you want to process, it will do all the wav and IR sysex files it can find.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... _1.2.0.jar
This is a significant issue for a 512-point speaker IR, much less so for a clean (i.e., no room reflections) 1024-point version of the same thing. The natural decay of a loudspeaker's IR is substantially complete before the 21.33ms period of a 1024-point IR, rendering the audible effect of the data window function relatively minor.bmi said:I will regret the old version for the windowing option...it gives interesting different sounds for the cab.
AlbertA said:New version up, I removed the windowing options as the Axe-Fx does its own windowing now.
Also you can open up old IR sysex files and it will convert them to the new format for you.
I also added a batch processing support as well for both wav and sysx files - to use just choose a file in the directory you want to process, it will do all the wav and IR sysex files it can find.
http://guitarlogic.org/axefx_ir/Axe-FxI ... _1.2.0.jar
IMO it depends on the pulse that you use to record your IRs.Jay Mitchell said:This is a significant issue for a 512-point speaker IR, much less so for a clean (i.e., no room reflections) 1024-point version of the same thing. The natural decay of a loudspeaker's IR is substantially complete before the 21.33ms period of a 1024-point IR, rendering the audible effect of the data window function relatively minor.bmi said:I will regret the old version for the windowing option...it gives interesting different sounds for the cab.
No, it does not. Your opinion is woefully mistaken. Any technique that produces a valid impulse response will work, and the impulse response will be the same regardless of the method used to acquire it.bmi said:IMO it depends on the pulse that you use to record your IRs.
"Trivial" in what way? A log sweep excitation with proper deconvolution offers major advantages over using an impulse as the excitation:A trivial method is to use a sweep for speakers.
The sweep I use is 12 seconds in length. With the appropriate deconvolution algorithm, it yields a much more accurate IR than can be acquired with an impulsive excitation. The decay of a speaker's impulse response has nothing to do with the type - or duration - of the signal used to acquire that impulse response. Once again, you're attempting to use your ignorance of the subject to make a spurious argument. You would be much better served by some serious study. I can recommend some mathematics texts, if you decide you want to learn something rather than argue.So tell me when happens the natural decay of the speaker when the sweep is 22ms length?