72 hours without electricity

Energy storage is key. Current power plants have ample ability to provide more than enough power 99% of the time and are usually not operating at full capacity. If there's no extra demand, they won't produce. If we had power storage options, plants could build up an emergency reserve for times of abnormally high demand. That currently does not exist.
Right on those counts. On the one hand it's crazy that the power grid in the US (and everywhere else I believe) has no way to store surplus power for times of peak demand. Buuuut the rub is that we have not developed a technology that can do it at the scale that's needed. Two possible approaches are to use some kind of (massive!) battery system, or use electricity to crack water into oxygen and hydrogen, store them, then run them into fuel cells to deliver supplemental electricity on demand. Those are great conceptual ideas, but the engineering, testing, and development that's required to actually make it work and scale it up into production is at very, very early stages still.
 
Dodged a few bullets here in SW VA. The one on the way tonight scares me a little more though.
 
On the one hand, this is a exceptional event in Texas, so maybe it doesn't make sense to go to the expense of preparing for such a rare situation. On the other hand, the whole point of a power grid is to handle exceptional events. Instead of handling the exceptional event, millions of people in Texas have no power or potable water. It seems like the unique way Texas manages their grid deserves some reevaluation.
 
Can't have that, most likely; but, there's no reason every burgh couldn't start having it's own small Thorium (or similar) 4th gen mass-produced design, production starting around 2030 and filling most of the country by 2070.

From everything I hear, it not only solves most of any given country's contribution to climate concerns, but grid-wise, it's a ripe solution just waiting to fall off the tree.
Someone pretty deliberately made it prohibitively expensive to do anything nuclear related in this country. Every reactor has to be bespoke here for some reason, and every nut and bolt costs an arm and a leg if it’s anywhere near a power station. China is pursuing thorium right now and there’s no such bullshit there.
 
The point is these events are going to become less exceptional in the coming years. More CO2 ➡️ More heat energy ➡️ More free water from melted ice ➡️ Decreased salt in the oceans ➡️ Increased ocean temps ➡️ more energetic storm systems ➡️ More damage in previously unusual regions ➡️

More free water ➡️ Ocean levels rising ➡️ Massive displacement of people inland and more mass extinctions. We are already losing 200 unique species daily and that’s going to get worse.
Food stocks and sources are going to be lost as everything in the ocean dies off and/or is overfished. This is a planet-wide thermal runaway and people won’t recognize it for what it is since it’s happening in real time and relatively slow-motion.

cause and effect
action and reaction
The Laws of Thermodynamics
 
Last edited:
The Ministry for the Future - Novel by Kim Stanley Robinson was one of The Economist’s best books of 2020.

“Climate change is a notoriously tough subject for novelists—this is its most important treatment for some time. Led by an Irish former minister, an intergovernmental body explores avenues from terrorism to geoengineering to central banking as it bids to avert disaster. At times horrifying, at others seeming almost to spin out of control, the book is powered by a hopeful yet illusionless vision of the future.”

Coming back from a time of illness: how finance can learn from climate change fiction - is a review from a prof at the London School of Economics (LSE).
 
Last edited:
Right on those counts. On the one hand it's crazy that the power grid in the US (and everywhere else I believe) has no way to store surplus power for times of peak demand. Buuuut the rub is that we have not developed a technology that can do it at the scale that's needed. Two possible approaches are to use some kind of (massive!) battery system, or use electricity to crack water into oxygen and hydrogen, store them, then run them into fuel cells to deliver supplemental electricity on demand. Those are great conceptual ideas, but the engineering, testing, and development that's required to actually make it work and scale it up into production is at very, very early stages still.
Yeah it's no easy task to store that much power for any period of time. Battery technology is definitely not there yet. Some areas with hydro production use "gravity batteries" where they pump water into huge holding reservoirs upstream for later release through dam generators but that's got limited scope. It's also not an option in areas with water scarcity, which will continue to spread. Closed loop systems could be used to circulate the same water back and forth but you still have to contend with evaporation losses. Not an easy nut to crack.
 
The point is these events are going to become less exceptional in the coming years. More CO2 ➡️ More heat energy ➡️ More free water from melted ice ➡️ Decreased salt in the oceans ➡️ Increased ocean temps ➡️ more energetic storm systems ➡️ More damage in previously unusual regions ➡️

More free water ➡️ Ocean levels rising ➡️ Massive displacement of people inland and more mass extinctions. We are already losing 200 unique species daily and that’s going to get worse.
Food stocks and sources are going to be lost as everything in the ocean dies off and/or is overfished. This is a planet-wide thermal runaway and people won’t recognize it for what it is since it’s happening in real time and relatively slow-motion.

cause and effect
action and reaction
The Laws of Thermodynamics
How do you explain all these: https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/texas/winter-storms-tx/ ? And how many new species are we finding daily? Did you know that the vast majority of already existing species are currently unknown?

Also curious how you explain the most informed man on climate change (tm) buying a $14M oceanfront property not long ago: https://nypost.com/2019/08/22/barack-and-michelle-obama-are-buying-15m-estate-in-marthas-vineyard/

For the record: global warming is an observable phenomenon, but much of the rest of what you list as "effect" is not. In particular, there's no evidence we're getting more severe weather effects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On the one hand, this is a exceptional event in Texas, so maybe it doesn't make sense to go to the expense of preparing for such a rare situation. On the other hand, the whole point of a power grid is to handle exceptional events. Instead of handling the exceptional event, millions of people in Texas have no power or potable water. It seems like the unique way Texas manages their grid deserves some reevaluation.

More to the point: The private entity that manages the grid needs to be scrutinized. The 'arctic blast' was forecast almost a week in advance. Plenty of notice. The emergency plan(s) were executed poorly....obviously. And I doubt we'll ever know the particulars. It's already being politicized by both parties. So there goes any truth or transparency.
 
The point is these events are going to become less exceptional in the coming years. More CO2 ➡️ More heat energy ➡️ More free water from melted ice ➡️ Decreased salt in the oceans ➡️ Increased ocean temps ➡️ more energetic storm systems ➡️ More damage in previously unusual regions ➡️

More free water ➡️ Ocean levels rising ➡️ Massive displacement of people inland and more mass extinctions. We are already losing 200 unique species daily and that’s going to get worse.
Food stocks and sources are going to be lost as everything in the ocean dies off and/or is overfished. This is a planet-wide thermal runaway and people won’t recognize it for what it is since it’s happening in real time and relatively slow-motion.

cause and effect
action and reaction
The Laws of Thermodynamics
It's like being a frog in a pot as the water slowly heats up. Perty soon yer goose is cooked if you just sit there....
 
Yeah it's no easy task to store that much power for any period of time. Battery technology is definitely not there yet. Some areas with hydro production use "gravity batteries" where they pump water into huge holding reservoirs upstream for later release through dam generators but that's got limited scope. It's also not an option in areas with water scarcity, which will continue to spread. Closed loop systems could be used to circulate the same water back and forth but you still have to contend with evaporation losses. Not an easy nut to crack.
On a small scale, compressing air is a fair method of storing energy. I wonder how scalable it is....
 
"Merchants of Doubt" is a great documentary.

Some industries have a viable interest in suppressing mass scientific consensus when it threatens their existence.
Best exemplified by the tobacco/lung cancer link "scientific" denialism, which continued for decades in mass media, until the tobacco industry stopped paying for it.

Now it persists to today with other brands of corporate-sponsored denialism. Shame.
 
Antarctica seems to have no problem with their windmills. Maybe, if proper preparation is done, things work better....
Really, you’re going to pay for frost-proof windmills in Texas of all places? For once in 30+ years blizzard?
 
Back
Top Bottom