Project Mayhem
Experienced
I'm not old enough to remember it, but for those that are, it must have been pretty cool. My wife tells me of watching at the Drive-in in Australia as a kid.
This event (I was 7) set the course of my life. Moon landing -> model rocketry (Estes, anyone?) -> science nerd -> undergraduate science research -> med school, etc.
I've been celebrating this like crazy. I miss the country I grew up in.
If you believe they put a man on the moon!
I hate to get this started because usually it ends in name calling and a generally bad vibe all around. That being said I can’t help myself because both 911 and the moon landing are so easily debunked from the official story its hard to see otherwise. But I say that respectfully.Lol! I will until someone can show me credible evidence to the contrary that can't easily be debunked, which to date, I haven't seen.
I love a good conspiracy as much as the next guy, but the moon, 9/11, and flat earther's have yet to come up with a solid theory that withstands scruntiny....Kennedy is another story though
I hate to get this started because usually it ends in name calling and a generally bad vibe all around. That being said I can’t help myself because both 911 and the moon landing are so easily debunked from the official story its hard to see otherwise. But I say that respectfully.
yes I agree with you. conjecture is not enough. There is evidence on both sides of every perception of truth. My questions regarding the official account of the lunar landing as well as the official story regarding the 911 attack are regarding the scientific evidence of the validity of both.I understand where your coming from, and agree that these day's it's difficult to discuss things in a civil manner. However, the optimist in me believe's it can still be done provided it's with reasonable minded people willing to consider fact's and logic and avoid conjecture. I have my views on a number of thing's but I will always respectfully welcome any counter view/info that I may not have considered previously, provided that view is delivered in an equally respectful manner.
Like I said I love a good conspiracy, I just haven't found many that can be supported by fact's and logic...some, but not many.
I like to think I'm well versed on most of the theories on both subject's, but maybe I don't have all the info. Of the popular moon theories, the only one I've seen that does give me pause is the crew's bizarre verbal and non verbal response's in the post mission press conference.they do show many of the signs of deception for questions, you would think, they would have anticipated...but that alone isn't enough, at least in my case.
Ironically, one my wife's favorite movies is Capricorn 1...go figure.
The temperature of jet fuel does not burn hot enough to bring a building down from top to bottom at that rate. Many professional engineers agree with this observation.
Just a few observations.
Time to reach for the ignore button...
yes I agree with you. conjecture is not enough. There is evidence on both sides of every perception of truth. My questions regarding the official account of the lunar landing as well as the official story regarding the 911 attack are regarding the scientific evidence of the validity of both.
To be honest, I see very little evidence in support of either official story.
The most conclusive evidence on the contrary with regards to the lunar landing is with regards to the video footage of the astronaut's shadows whilst jumping on the moon caused by the sun. In short, you can see the shadow of the astronaut lengthen disproportionately to the distance from the light source (the sun). If you jump up and down on the ground on a sunny day you will find almost no difference in shadow length because of the relative distance from the sun.
As for the official account of the 911 attack there is plenty of evidence that shows that a building on fire does not fall at the free fall rate that both buildings fell. I do not claim that we were not attacked but it looks obvious to me that the buildings fell in a demolition style not in a weakening of the structure due to a jet fuel fire. The temperature of jet fuel does not burn hot enough to bring a building down from top to bottom at that rate. Many professional engineers agree with this observation.
Just a few observations.
Time to reach for the ignore button...