There was a VW Beetle with a Fender badge on it that had an amp sim and a 1/4" jack on the dash board you could plug your guitar in to...Imagine a Tesla with a built in Axe-Fx (or should I sa an Axe-Fx with a built in Tesla ).
There was a VW Beetle with a Fender badge on it that had an amp sim and a 1/4" jack on the dash board you could plug your guitar in to...Imagine a Tesla with a built in Axe-Fx (or should I sa an Axe-Fx with a built in Tesla ).
*Axe-Fx Wishlist - VW/fender Model Plz*There was a VW Beetle with a Fender badge on it that had an amp sim and a 1/4" jack on the dash board you could plug your guitar in to...
It will have to be 2 models - with and without proper emissions*Axe-Fx Wishlist - VW/fender Model Plz*
Sounds like you have it backwards...? The part where Cliff says "addictive," he's referring to less negative feedback where the power amp response follows the speaker impedance curve with its scooped mids. If you increase the negative feedback, the speaker impedance has less of an effect on the response of the power amp, so the mids flatten out.But I did notice that when playing in a mix it cut less. Now after reading this, the way I understand it is this is because the EQ spectrum is widened out as you increase it. As Cliff sort of said: It becomes addictive and there is a trade-off. I liken it to a scooped EQ tone. Sounds awesome on its own but doesn't cut.
Sounds like you have it backwards...? The part where Cliff says "addictive," he's referring to less negative feedback where the power amp response follows the speaker impedance curve with its scooped mids. If you increase the negative feedback, the speaker impedance has less of an effect on the response of the power amp, so the mids flatten out.
initially rejected as a perpetual motion
I don't get it, the negative feedback is parasitic on the output, not additive...that's backwards from perpetual motion
If we have presence and resonance to control high and low frequencies respectively, then what's the point of bass, mid and treble controls on an amp?
Thank you for your response. So does that mean that bass, mid and treble control the preamp and presence and resonance control the power amp?
Same in the III. It's been discussed. My guess is that the Axe tries to compensate, but like other attempts to estimate how non-linearities will effect "everyone", it's a compromise, and in many cases it overcompensates.From my understanding of negative feedback, it reintroduces the signal back to the front of the amp, which leads to better linearity among other things, but also has a noticeable drop in volume. When I turn up the negative feedback value in the amp block however, volume increases. I've tried Marshalls, Mesas, Fenders, Voxes, etc. Am I misunderstanding how nfb works, or is there a volume compensation going on behind the scenes? AxeFX II Mk1 Ares 2 user here
That's what I figured, but why keep the compensation if it doesn't work and you still have to compensate that? Might as well get the actual result and go from there.Same in the III. It's been discussed. My guess is that the Axe tries to compensate, but like other attempts to estimate how non-linearities will effect "everyone", it's a compromise, and in many cases it overcompensates.
The volume drop is drastic and much more than the small volume increase with the compensated technique.That's what I figured, but why keep the compensation if it doesn't work and you still have to compensate that? Might as well get the actual result and go from there.
Though I'm not an EE by an means, the magic going on behind the scenes is way outside what I can understand.