Pwrmac7600
Power User
Ok so at the risk of upsetting the Fractal gods, I just have to ask...
If this amp is just a C++ and not a model of an actual amp owned by Metallica, then why call it such?
Why not just market it for what it is, a Mark IIC++?
I mean it's easy enough to just call it what it actually is, and then when describing it state that is is a modded version of the MK IIC+ used by guitarist such as Petrucci, Hetfield, etc.....
Not trying to ruffle any feathers here, just curious as to the logic behind releasing it as "Metallica Mark IIC++" when in fact it's not..
I have a feeling I will get a beat down for this, but I just had to ask...
If this amp is just a C++ and not a model of an actual amp owned by Metallica, then why call it such?
Why not just market it for what it is, a Mark IIC++?
I mean it's easy enough to just call it what it actually is, and then when describing it state that is is a modded version of the MK IIC+ used by guitarist such as Petrucci, Hetfield, etc.....
Not trying to ruffle any feathers here, just curious as to the logic behind releasing it as "Metallica Mark IIC++" when in fact it's not..
I have a feeling I will get a beat down for this, but I just had to ask...