Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 169
Like Tree260Likes

Thread: Another V10 Preview

  1. #141
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    67
    Wow, can't believe I've never thought to try two different cabs or mics. Do you guys normally just run them in series or route them in parallel? Not sure how the sound would be different, if at all. I'm going to try it.

  2. #142
    Rex
    Rex is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,268
    Quote Originally Posted by DraggAmps View Post
    Wow, can't believe I've never thought to try two different cabs or mics. Do you guys normally just run them in series or route them in parallel? Not sure how the sound would be different, if at all. I'm going to try it.
    Yes, parallel. An easy way to do that is to use a single stereo cab with a different model for each side. You can pan them both to center if you're running in mono.
    Kriig likes this.

  3. #143
    Senior Member Kriig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ålesund, Norway
    Posts
    1,656
    I allways do this. Usually without mic on one side. R121 sounds good, but sometimes feels a little boxy-ish to me.

    2 cabs and a 57 combined with no mic gives ME the best feel.

    I use OH beta, Top boost blue and Mesa OH in some kind of combination. Works with every amp.

    The air knob in the cab block balances the high freq's. It is essential to me. Probably the only "advanced" parameter i use.

  4. #144
    Member stevorc321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by FractalAudio View Post
    I very often use two cabs and often it is the same cab with different mics and maybe a bit of delay on one mic.
    Would it be possible/worthwhile to combine the 57/121 eq into a single axe FX mic setting to save a cab block?..or add a 'mic 1', and 'mic 2' option in the cab block?
    Last edited by stevorc321; Jan-5-2013 at 06:13 AM.
    voes likes this.

  5. #145
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    902
    Quote Originally Posted by FractalAudio View Post
    The 1st part is the real amp.
    Incredible... second part sounds better to me specially on chords

  6. #146
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Sweden, Stockholm
    Posts
    462
    Quote Originally Posted by stevorc321 View Post
    Would it be possible/worthwhile to combine the 57/121 eq into a single axe FX mic setting to save a cab block?..or add a 'mic 1', and 'mic 2' option in the cab block?
    If you chose one cab block and chose stereo mode, then you can have two different cabs in one cab block and each cab can have their separate mick.

  7. #147
    Member stevorc321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by jeppekristoffer View Post
    If you chose one cab block and chose stereo mode, then you can have two different cabs in one cab block and each cab can have their separate mick.
    yeah - I meant for HiRes mode

  8. #148
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Sweden, Stockholm
    Posts
    462
    Ok. Sorry. Didn't get that.

  9. #149
    Member stevorc321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by jeppekristoffer View Post
    Ok. Sorry. Didn't get that.
    It just seems like a lot of guys are putting in 2 Hires cab blocks for the sake of the 2 mics. In the real world, you would mike the one cab with 2 mics - so maybe that could be mimicked in the Axe with combined mic options in the Hires block

  10. #150
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany, Saarland
    Posts
    687
    Quote Originally Posted by stevorc321 View Post
    It just seems like a lot of guys are putting in 2 Hires cab blocks for the sake of the 2 mics. In the real world, you would mike the one cab with 2 mics - so maybe that could be mimicked in the Axe with combined mic options in the Hires block
    You could capture two hires blocks with a TMA and export it as a usercab and use it.
    And if you want to you can capture following EQ blocks too
    .
    That should save a bit of cpu power and make it easier to select 'your' cab combinations.

    IMO the better the amp modelling became the less complicated cab settings are necessary. The advantage of two blocks compared to one is getting smaller and smaller with each step of the modeling. That's a great thing.

  11. #151
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    849
    2 hi res blocks take up to much CPU. IMO. Two low res and one stereo cab is enough. I am willing to bet very few people an tell the audible difference in a live setting

  12. #152
    Global Moderator javajunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    9,880
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by brokenvail View Post
    2 hi res blocks take up to much CPU. IMO. Two low res and one stereo cab is enough. I am willing to bet very few people an tell the audible difference in a live setting
    Between hi res and lo res there is no difference for the stock cabs (at least the ones I looked at) the energy dies out before you get to the point where the hi-res would come into play.
    Sean Strickland
    Fractal Audio Beta Tester

  13. #153
    Senior Member barhrecords's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    34.673, -86.745
    Posts
    2,709
    Quote Originally Posted by brokenvail View Post
    2 hi res blocks take up to much CPU. IMO. Two low res and one stereo cab is enough. I am willing to bet very few people an tell the audible difference in a live setting
    I'm not sure I can hear a difference in my mix room either let alone live.

  14. #154
    Member islandmusic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by FractalAudio
    Iterative
    Putting additional nonlinearity into a product containing the term "fractal" in its name is probably appropriate.
    Last edited by islandmusic; Jan-5-2013 at 01:09 PM.
    Please support my Crossroads 2013 bid here: http://www.playcrossroads.com/u/benjischaub

    Island Music
    Bonaire, Caribbean
    http://www.islandmusic.pro

    Fender Stratocaster (Master Tone/Texas Specials), White, 1994
    Paul Reed Smith CE24, Black, 1991
    Godin Nylon Duet Ambiance, Natural, 2011
    Marshall JVM 410C, Axe-Fx 2

  15. #155
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    2,137
    Quote Originally Posted by islandmusic View Post
    Putting additional nonlinearity into a product containing the term "fractal" in its name is probably appropriate.
    There are linear and non-linear fractals though...so...
    - IAN C. -
    Sounds: SoundCloud | Akale
    Rig: PRS | Schecter USA | Gibson USA | Axe-Fx II | empress effects
    Beta tester: Fractal Audio | empress effects

  16. #156
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    302
    Both the Bassman and 5150 models seem to have a bumped presence thing going on.....


    I think we can say that Cliff will likely always do 'amp, Axe' - not just because he has done so, but because a) he's a straight shooter, and, even more poignantly, b) because he has a sense of order.

  17. #157
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tilburg - The Netherlands
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by yek View Post
    Cannot share the IR itself, contains copyrighted IRs.
    The mix recipe (for example to use in AOM DSP):

    BasketweaveG12H30s-R121-CapEdge-3in
    BasketweaveG12H30s-SM57-Cone-0_5in
    BasketweaveG12H30s-U87-CapEdge-2in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-R121-Cap-4in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-SM57-Cone-0_5in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-U87-CapEdge-2in
    I created those in mixIR2 with your settings and the OB Mesa Cab which is slightly darker. I like the result, thanks for sharing.
    BTW, I created two blocks in mixIR2 with no panning in the IRs. I tried different panning settings C, 30, 50, 75, 100 but I can't hear that as strong as when using two IRs in the Axe Fx and panning these. So panning in mixIR2 doesn't seem to have much impact on the sound somehow? Does this work better in aomDSP?

  18. #158
    Senior Member Secret80'sMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by yek View Post
    Cannot share the IR itself, contains copyrighted IRs.

    The mix recipe (for example to use in AOM DSP):

    BasketweaveG12H30s-R121-CapEdge-3in
    BasketweaveG12H30s-SM57-Cone-0_5in
    BasketweaveG12H30s-U87-CapEdge-2in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-R121-Cap-4in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-SM57-Cone-0_5in
    MarkIIC_EV12L-U87-CapEdge-2in

    In equal amounts.

    These are Red Wire IRs. Similar results can be obtained by using OwnHammer IRs.
    Thank you, I will try that!
    yek likes this.
    Fractal Audio MFC-101, Relay G90 Rackmount Wireless, Mission Engineering SP1-R Pedal, Ernie Ball Volume Pedal, OwnHammer V2 IRs

    The Reflex - The Ultimate 80's Tribute Band http://www.reflexlive.com

  19. #159
    yek
    yek is offline
    Senior Member yek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,867
    Quote Originally Posted by harmaes View Post
    I created those in mixIR2 with your settings and the OB Mesa Cab which is slightly darker. I like the result, thanks for sharing.
    BTW, I created two blocks in mixIR2 with no panning in the IRs. I tried different panning settings C, 30, 50, 75, 100 but I can't hear that as strong as when using two IRs in the Axe Fx and panning these. So panning in mixIR2 doesn't seem to have much impact on the sound somehow? Does this work better in aomDSP?
    Panning? MixIR only creates mono IRs (no panning).
    Alexander van Engelen
    Fractal Audio beta tester
    Presets | Wiki | MFC how-tos | Amp models list | Cab models list

  20. #160
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tilburg - The Netherlands
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by yek View Post
    Panning? MixIR only creates mono IRs (no panning).
    The seperate IR blocks can be panned in mixIR2 but it's hardly audible in the Axe Fx II. I'm no expert here so I'm not sure how the panning information is transferred into the wav file when exporting?

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •